This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

In partnership with

In 2008, Crocs’ stock tanked from the high $60s to about a dollar a share, and the brand became shorthand for a fad that had already died. But in 2021, the same ‘fad’ was posting a higher operating margin than Nike!

📊 Snackable Stat — 29.5%

Crocs' full-year 2021 GAAP operating margin, nearly double Nike's roughly 15.6 percent that same fiscal year

Here’s what you’ll learn: 

  • Why closing a third of Crocs' stores and cutting 30 to 40 percent of its product line was the fix, not a retreat, the second time the company nearly disappeared

  • How Andrew Rees turned an "ugly shoe" reputation into a scarcity machine with sub-$70 celebrity drops that sold out in minutes and reset how people saw the base clog

  • Why a $10 million accessory business (Jibbitz) became one of the highest-leverage bets in footwear, letting Crocs sell newness without ever opening a new factory

Discover the Future of Retail Technology at Smart Retail Tech Expo New York

Retail is evolving faster than ever, with new technologies transforming the way businesses connect with customers, improve operations, and drive growth.

Join us at the Smart Retail Tech Expo New York on September 30–October 1 at the Javits Center, New York, and discover the innovations shaping the future of retail.

Attendees will have the opportunity to:

  • Explore the latest retail technology solutions

  • Discover advancements in AI, automation, ecommerce, payments, and customer experience

  • Connect with leading technology providers and industry experts

  • Learn strategies to improve efficiency and enhance customer engagement

Whether you're looking to modernize your retail strategy, improve the customer journey, or stay ahead of industry trends, Smart Retail Tech Expo is the place to find the tools and insights you need.

Plus, one FREE ticket gives you access to co-located retail events, creating a unique opportunity to discover solutions across sourcing, technology, and supply chain—all under one roof.

Join thousands of retail professionals discovering what's next in retail innovation.

A Shoe Company That Kept Trying To Be Something That It Wasn’t

Crocs came into the market as a slip-resistant boat shoe all the way back in 2002. It was made from a proprietary closed-cell foam called Croslite. It caught on fast: by 2007 the company had introduced more than 300 different styles and a 2006 IPO to peak annual revenue of $847 million. Management read that success as proof Crocs could become a full lifestyle brand, and pushed into dress flats, wedges, golf cleats and boots, categories with nothing to do with what had actually made the clog work.

But when the recession hit, Crocs’ diversification didn’t make things easier for them. In 2008, Crocs lost $185 million and its stock collapsed from the high $60s to about a dollar a share. “They’re dead and they don’t know it”, said one hedge fund manager, describing Crocs as a walking zombie. The company managed to become profitable again by 2010, but despite that, leadership kept insisting on diversification. They kept adding SKUs throughout the early 2010s.

By 2013, Crocs kept widening its product range. However, this resulted in them having a catalog streched thing across categories where they had no real design edge. They fought a losing battle with Nike, Sketchers, and legacy fashion brands instead of simply defending their patented molded clog which nobody else could copy. Growth was masking the actual problem, which was that Crocs kept spending its scarce marketing and design dollars fighting battles it had no business fighting.

The major shift happened that December, when Blackstone invested $200 million for two board seats and a 13 percent stake in the company. In the following 12 months, Crocs had cut more than 180 jobs, closed around 100 of its 624 stores, and binned around 35 percent of their underperforming styles. The company refocused on their molded footwear line that had once generated $847 million on its own.

Cut Everything, Then Make People Beg for What's Left

Andrew Rees arrived at Crocs in 2014 as brand president, straight from L.E.K. Consulting, where he had helped write the turnaround plan he was now hired to run. He was named CEO outright in June 2017. His first moves weren't about brand voice. They were structural: close roughly 160 more stores, about 28 percent of the global fleet, between 2014 and 2018, and by August of that year, shut down Crocs' last owned factories in Mexico and Italy, moving to a fully outsourced model where the company ships Croslite pellets and steel molds to third-party manufacturers instead of owning plants.

That discipline showed up in the internal targets before it ever showed up in headlines. On the company's Q2 2018 earnings call, management set goals of a gross margin in the low 50s and SG&A in the low 40s as a percent of revenue, a cost structure most footwear brands never reach. And Crocs kept doubling down on what made them special. By the third quarter of 2020, clogs alone made up 72 percent of footwear revenue, up from 62 percent a year earlier. Betting on the core product compounded rather than plateaued.

Crocs’ second major move was the one people remember the most: turn the shoe's reputation for being ugly into the reason to want it. Starting in 2018, Crocs began dropping limited-run collaborations, tiny batches, real artists, prices near $60, and let scarcity do the marketing a big campaign budget couldn't. Post Malone's first clog sold out in 10 minutes and immediately resold for as much as $900 on eBay. Bad Bunny's glow-in-the-dark drop sold out in 16 minutes in September 2020, with pairs reselling for up to $300. Justin Bieber's drew house collaboration sold out that October, and a second Bieber drop the following March sold out in 90 minutes. None of these drops moved meaningful unit volume on their own. What they moved was perception: each one generated free press, reset the base clog as culturally alive instead of a punchline, and fed a resale market that made simply owning a pair feel like winning something.

The third leg was almost invisible and arguably the highest-leverage move of all. Crocs had bought a tiny accessory company called Jibbitz for $10 million back in 2006, and under Rees it became the way Crocs sold newness without touching its factory-free supply chain again. Instead of designing new shoe styles, the habit that had nearly killed the company twice, Crocs could release new charms instead. By 2022, Jibbitz accounted for 8 percent of company revenue and had grown 27 percent year over year, most of it dropping straight to the bottom line on a five-dollar plastic charm.

Join Anthropic, Kalshi, and Clay at Pioneer on October 7th

Pioneer, the summit where CX leaders redefine what’s possible, is on October 7th.

Join leaders from Fin, Anthropic, Clay, and Kalshi for an insightful conversation on the state of AI transformation.

You’ll discover how some of the most innovative minds in CX have transformed their organizations, learn how they think about CX, and hear how they're planning for what's next.

Join the conversation in San Francisco, or tune in virtually.

From Punchline to the Best Margin in Footwear

The strategy had already proved its worth, producing four straight years of growth by 2020. Then the pandemic hit, and everything was amplified. Working from home and comfort culture brought a wave of new fans to the brand. Crocs closed 2020 with record revenue of $1.386 billion, up nearly 13 percent, with operating margin climbing to 15.4 percent from 10.5 percent the year before. That was already the best year in company history. But it didn’t stop there.

In 2021, revenue made another massive jump, this time to $2.313 billion (up 67 percent in a single year), with gross margin expanding to 61.4 percent, and operating margin nearly doubling to 29.5 percent. This operating margin put it ahead of Nike, which ran roughly 15.6 percent that fiscal year. In 2020, Crocs sold about 69 million pairs of shoes; in 2021, it sold 103 million pairs, more than doubling net income to $725.7 million.

This time, Crocs was careful not to repeat its 2008-era mistake of chasing every category at once. In 2021, it paid $2.5 billion for HEYDUDE, a second casual footwear brand, funded mostly through cash and debt. The core Crocs brand kept compounding afterward, crossing $3.28 billion in 2024, up 8.8 percent, even as HEYDUDE itself fell 13.2 percent the same year on oversupply, a reminder that the original discipline (do one thing exceptionally, resist becoming everything) is easier to preach than to repeat inside a newly bought brand.

What survived is the playbook, not just the shoe. Crocs still runs on a $50 product, sold direct wherever possible, refreshed constantly through five-dollar charms and expensive-feeling celebrity drops instead of a bloated design calendar. The company once dismissed as a joke now runs one of the highest operating margins in an industry full of much bigger names, and it got there the same way it survived twice before: by doing less, better.

Key takeaways to consider…

  1. Subtraction as a strategy, not a retreat. Crocs' comeback started with closing stores, cutting 30 to 40 percent of its SKUs, and shutting down its own factories entirely, before a single celebrity collaboration ever launched. Cutting first freed the capital and focus that made everything after possible.

  2. Scarcity can replace a marketing budget. Post Malone, Bad Bunny, and Justin Bieber didn't move much volume directly. But they convinced the public that limited runs vanished in minutes and resold for hundreds of dollars, repositioning the brand better than any traditional ad campaign could have.

  3. The highest-leverage move is often the smallest one. A $10 million accessory company bought in 2006 turned into an 8-percent-of-revenue, high-margin business that let Crocs sell newness constantly without ever redesigning the shoe or opening another factory.

🍫 Power Numbers

$1.386 billion - Crocs' record revenue in 2020, up nearly 13% year over year 

$2.313 billion - Crocs' revenue in 2021, up 67% in a single year 

29.5% - Crocs' full-year 2021 GAAP operating margin 

160 - Crocs retail locations closed between 2014 and 2018 

72% - Share of Crocs' footwear revenue from clogs in Q3 2020 

10 minutes - Time it took Post Malone's first Crocs collaboration to sell out in December 2018

Want to reach 50,000+ technologists, decision makers, and business-savvy readers? Partner with us.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate