After trying to find affordable glasses, Dave Gilboa and his three classmates kept running into the same company hiding under different logos. The group of students then decided to build an entire business model around the price complaint.

Warby Parker's net revenue in 2024, up 15.2% from the year before

Here’s what you’ll learn: 

Gilboa wasn't wrong to be suspicious of the price. A single company, formed by a 2017 merger between Italy's Luxottica and France's Essilor, held the licenses behind Prada, Chanel, Giorgio Armani, and Ralph Lauren. It ran the factories that made the lenses inside them, and then sold the finished product through its own LensCrafters, Sunglass Hut, Pearle Vision, and Target Optical stores. If a shopper paid with vision insurance, there was a real chance that the insurer, EyeMed, belonged to the same parent too. Four storefronts and a dozen designer names could all trace back to one balance sheet.

Regulators had actually tried to fix this decades earlier. The FTC's 1978 Eyeglass Rule requires prescribers to hand patients a copy of their prescription automatically, specifically so they can shop it around instead of buying wherever they got examined. It barely mattered. Most people replace their glasses only once every two to three years, which isn't often enough to build real price sensitivity, and there was rarely anywhere meaningfully cheaper to take that prescription. A rule built to create competition ran into a market where nearly all the competitors answered to the same owner.

The concentration was measurable, not just anecdotal. EssilorLuxottica's share of the fragmented U.S. eyewear market had climbed as high as 51% at its peak, and years later, its LensCrafters, Sunglass Hut, Oakley, and Ray-Ban retail brands alone still controlled a combined 28% of the market as of 2024. Warby Parker, for comparison, held just 4% as recently as early 2017. A near-monopoly doesn't need 90% of a market to set the price. It just needs to own enough of the visible alternatives that customers stop bothering to compare.

Gilboa's classmates Neil Blumenthal, Andy Hunt, and Jeff Raider built an entire business plan around that specific complaint. Blumenthal had previously run a nonprofit that trained women in the developing world to sell eyeglasses, so he already understood how far U.S. retail prices had drifted from what a frame actually cost to make. The four surveyed classmates relentlessly on everything from names to pricing, and nearly launched at $45 a pair before a marketing professor talked them into $95, a number he argued would still read as a steal without looking cheap.

But price wasn't the hardest problem to solve. Trust was. In 2010, fewer than 2.5% of glasses sold in America were bought online, because almost nobody wants to buy something that sits on their face sight unseen. Warby Parker's answer was Home Try-On: pick five frames, get them shipped for free, wear them around the apartment for five days, and mail back whatever didn't work, no credit card required upfront. It turned a purchase that used to require an optician into a decision made with friends over a kitchen table, and it built a waitlist 20,000 names long within weeks.

Physical retail came later, and on Warby Parker's own terms. Before opening a physical store, the company first waited for demand to build up. In 2013, three years after launch, a loyal digital following proved the time was right: Warby Parker officially opened its first permanent store. That discipline shows up in the unit economics: a targeted $2,900 in sales per square foot, close to luxury-retail territory, and a payback period on new stores of under 20 months.

The company then built its own version of vertical integration and pointed it the other way. It added daily contact lenses in 2019, then eye exams and vision tests inside its stores, and began accepting most major vision insurance plans, the exact category of coverage EssilorLuxottica uses to steer customers into its own stores. The number of Warby Parker locations offering eye exams grew from 194 to 236 in a single year, and by 2025 that segment was growing 44% year over year, roughly three times the pace of the rest of the company. Warby Parker was both underselling the incumbent and copying its structure.

Retail is evolving faster than ever, with new technologies transforming the way businesses connect with customers, improve operations, and drive growth.

Join us at the Smart Retail Tech Expo New York on September 30–October 1 at the Javits Center, New York, and discover the innovations shaping the future of retail.

Attendees will have the opportunity to:

Whether you're looking to modernize your retail strategy, improve the customer journey, or stay ahead of industry trends, Smart Retail Tech Expo is the place to find the tools and insights you need.

Plus, one FREE ticket gives you access to co-located retail events, creating a unique opportunity to discover solutions across sourcing, technology, and supply chain—all under one roof.

Register for your free ticket today

Join thousands of retail professionals discovering what's next in retail innovation.

The results show up cleanly in the numbers. Warby Parker's net revenue grew from $272.9 million in 2018 to $771.3 million in 2024, nearly tripling in six years. By the third quarter of 2024, the company held 7.2% of the U.S. eyewear market, up from 6.8% a year earlier and from just 4% at the start of 2017. It crossed $872 million in revenue in 2025 and posted its first full year of GAAP net income.

The clearest sign of how far the brand has traveled is what it just retired. In 2025, the same free box of frames that built the company's first following was sunset entirely. With hundreds of stores open and a virtual try-on tool built into its app, the free box tactic that kickstarted the company had become a cost the business no longer needed to carry. 

Despite the success, Warby Parker didn’t dethrone EssilorLuxottica, which pulled in €26.5 billion in 2024 and carries a market value north of $87 billion, more than twenty times Warby Parker's own. But the giant's fastest growth today is actually coming from Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses, a category EssilorLuxottica built with Meta rather than one it's using to fight Warby Parker on $95 eyewear. Warby Parker, in turn, is chasing its own version of that opportunity through a $150 million partnership with Google, set to launch its first Intelligent Eyewear collection in the fall of 2026.

Despite not beating EssilorLuxottica, Warby Parker proved that a fair price and a trusted brand could carve out a durable business inside a market built to prevent exactly that. 

Key takeaways to consider…

7.2% - Warby Parker's U.S. eyewear market share in Q3 2024 

2.51 million - Active Warby Parker customers at the end of 2024 

55.3% - Warby Parker's record gross margin in 2024 

$2,900 - Targeted average sales per square foot for new Warby Parker stores 

$6 billion+ - Warby Parker's market valuation on its first trading day 

$95 - Warby Parker's starting price for a complete pair of prescription glasses